Wednesday, February 20, 2008

What the hell!

I thought of writing a proper entry on how excited I am to be voting for the first time. I was planning to say that our vote is P&C so I am not going to reveal which party I am going to vote for. I was also planning to say that unlike US voters who choose their candidate based on their current policy stance, I am not that much influenced by all that coz it all looks like gibberish to me. All I care about is a peaceful, prosperous and comfortable community to live in. Then I came across these articles. What the hell... Now I AM INFLUENCED by what policy they are making. If you don't know how to run a country, then don't run for candidacy. Or at the very least, don't make such ridiculous promise just for the sake of winning a seat without thinking of the consequences to the country. Yes, the promise seems very attractive. Petrol subsidy is essential for the people of the nation BUT it's ALL about balance. You can't expect to tackle one issue without sacrificing another in the economy. Are they trying to push us back to being a socialise economy? Yeah, that sounds like fun. Lets go back to using coupons to get food in the country. Ration it and divide equally regardless of taste, need or effort put in. This statement came in light just a day after I read about Melaka government trying to offer jobs to poor people but they refuse to work as they would prefer to receive benefits instead. (Of course, I haven't factored in those who are REALLY incapable. Hopefully the statistics would already have.) And I dislike beggers!!! Go find a job! A cleaner, a nanny, clerk... Whatever... If you are capable enough to walk around asking for money, you are capable enough to at least swipe the floor or probably be a translator for the blind or something. At least, now you know who I will NOT be voting for. Hmmph!!!

Copied from www.utusan.com.my

Syor Pas tak masuk akal
KUALA LUMPUR 19 Feb. – Cadangan Pas menubuhkan negara kebajikan disifatkan sebagai tidak masuk akal dalam keadaan dunia menghadapi kenaikan harga minyak mentah mencecah AS$100 dolar (RM320) setong.

Justeru, banyak pihak berpendapat, konsep itu hanya janji manis parti pembangkang untuk menawan hati pengundi yang akhirnya menyebabkan rakyat hidup melarat dan tertekan.

Presiden Persekutuan Syarikat-Syarikat Tersenarai Awam, Datuk Seri Megat Najmuddin Megat Khas berkata, Pas perlu lebih realistik dengan konsep negara kebajikan kerana bukan mudah menyalurkan begitu banyak subsidi kepada rakyat ketika harga minyak mentah di pasaran dunia semakin melambung.

Menurut beliau, kerajaan sudah pun membelanjakan RM40 bilion setahun untuk pemberian pelbagai bentuk subsidi termasuk petrol dan gas sedangkan peruntukan itu boleh digunakan untuk melaksanakan pelbagai bentuk pembangunan.

Katanya, subsidi itu yang berjumlah RM200 bilion untuk tempoh lima tahun menyamai keseluruhan peruntukan pembangunan Rancangan Malaysia Kesembilan (RMK-9).

“Pas tidak akan mampu memberi begitu banyak subsidi secara berterusan tanpa meningkatkan pendapatan negara. Adakah ini bermakna cukai akan ditingkatkan?’’ kata Megat Najmuddin ketika dihubungi Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini.

Beliau mengulas rancangan Pas untuk melancarkan manifesto rasmi bertajuk Negara Berkebajikan pada Khamis ini.

Setiausaha Agung Pas, Datuk Kamaruddin Jaafar berkata, manifesto setebal lebih 20 muka surat itu mengandungi tawaran-tawaran munasabah mengandungi penyelesaian kepada kegawatan ekonomi kepada rakyat Malaysia tidak kira jantina, kaum dan agama.

Sementara itu, Penasihat Jawatankuasa Bertindak Pelaksanaan Negara (NITF), Datuk Zainal Aznam Yusoff berkata, tindakan mewujudkan ‘negara kebajikan’ akan menjadikan rakyat semakin malas dan tidak berani menghadapi risiko.

‘‘Adakah ini bermaksud Pas akan membiayai perbelanjaan rakyat seumur hidup sehingga mereka tidak perlu mengeluarkan wang satu sen pun?’’ tanya beliau.

Menurutnya, pemberian subsidi tidak boleh diteruskan selama-lamanya kerana ia akan menjejaskan pembangunan negara.

Pakar ekonomi dan perbankan Islam, Datuk Dr. Nik Norzrul Thani Nik Hassan Thani pula berkata, hasrat Pas menubuhkan ‘negara kebajikan’ dikhuatiri melumpuhkan daya saing negara.

Beliau berpendapat, rakyat akan disogok dengan pelbagai bentuk elaun dan subsidi sehingga menyebabkan mereka hilang motivasi diri serta semangat keusahawanan.

Menurutnya, Nabi Muhammad s.a.w sendiri seorang tokoh perniagaan yang giat mengembangkan ekonomi umat Islam, bukan bersandarkan kepada kebajikan semata-mata.

‘‘Jangan sampai dikongkong oleh pemerintah sehingga daya saing kita semakin lumpuh,’’ ujarnya.
Copied from www.thestar.com.my
Shafie hits out at ‘quack’ solutions
KUALA LUMPUR: The opposition’s simple solution to complex world economic trends is irresponsible and akin to the “economics of Donald Duck,” said Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister Datuk Shafie Apdal.
Shafie chided the opposition for promising to reduce the price of petrol and diesel and to become more charitable if elected.
“The only way they can achieve this is by increasing the level of subsidy which was RM43bil last year,” he said yesterday.
“This is possible but totally unrealistic and extremely damaging as it will lead to higher inflation, loss of businesses and lower standard of living.
“The government has no intention of allowing the country to become a comic-strip economy.”
Shafie said this in his speech at the launch of the Credit Counselling and Debt Management Agency's (AKPK's) newly upgraded website. His speech was read out by the ministry’s deputy secretary-general (domestic trade) Dr Muzahet Masruri.
Shafie said steps such as careful enforcement of price controls were being taken to reduce financial pressures on the people and to minimise effects of rising global prices.
He commended Bank Negara and AKPK for their work in helping Malaysians in debt, which often occurred due to lack of knowledge in managing their finances.
“More than 26,000 people have received counselling and some 9,000 individuals have been helped under AKPK’s free debt management programme since it was set up in 2006.
“As of September last year, total household debt was about RM351bil with non-performing loans of about 7% (RM24.57bil.) Of this, credit card debt amounted to RM21.6bil,” he said, adding that those referred to AKPK were mostly in their 30s and 40s. Other debt include personal, housing and car loan.
AKPK chief executive officer Mohamed Akwal Sultan said their website www.akpk.org.my provided online advice within 24 hours to help individuals be more prudent with their finances.

18 comments:

irizis said...

Seriously, I hate politics. So can u summarize the content of the articles so dat tapayah nk memeningkan kepale memikirkan ape derang cakap :|
Terime kasih :)

Amethyste said...

sigh...that is why i'm not a fan of politics either...always have to view their promises with some scepticism..

A barrister told me once that politicians are failed barristers hahahahahah

mr dx said...

maybe, just maybe, the barrister u were talking about had aspirations to go into politics but he couldn't, so that's why he's trying to sooth himself? :p

like it or not, this is what we have to face as we get older. i've shied away from politics since i was a kid (u know la, them all saying students should not be involved etc etc) but then again that's just equivalent to "katak bawah tempurung". time to get an understanding of the bigger picture and carry out our responsibility as a citizen!

Anonymous said...

Bekerja untuk melihat apa yang kite percaya, itu cara Rasulullah SAW membentuk sahabat, untuk tawan Constantinapole.
http://saifulislam.com/?p=1484#more-1484

Farah Haida said...

irna: i'll do that later, just for you... ;) hehe
mimi: at least be realistic laa, right? maybe azmir's right about that barrister. LOL
azmir: yup2... time for us to shape the country and the economy
anonymous: who the hell are you??? should at least identify yourself. is the link your blog or you just link the article to summaries your ideology.
peeps... how come there's a stranger in my blog??? this is scary. coz u can't search my blog on the net. must be from a link... i feel stalked. eyhhhh

Farah Haida said...

eyh, grammar & spelling wrong already =p guess i was too shocked. haha.

anonymous: who the hell are you??? should at least identify yourself. is that you own blog or you just linkED the article to summariZE your ideology???

Referring to your comment and article, I am NOT saying that it is NOT achievable. I am saying... it is NOT EFFICIENT! It is like you are taking a step back instead moving forward. Ppl are trying to build the country, build the economy and you are trying to push the economy back... to be like Old China... Socialised economy. Closed-economy. Heavily subsidize economy. And I'm not saying we should not be subsidized. But we should not be subsidized TOO heavily which would reduce the competitiveness of the country. The money should also be used in other areas to further developed the country. No doubt we have to care about the people, reduce the wealth gap in the community. But we have to do that by pushing everyone forward. Make ppl to be more competitive. We NEED to be competitive!!! The country needs to be competitive!!! Increasing subsidy wouldn't bring that much benefit to the ppl. My opinion is to keep the subsidy as it is... let the price increase a BIT... then invest the money in developing a better transportation system. Increase comfort in using public transport etc. That would be more beneficial than to just feed the people money.

Yes, you can respond to my comment. I'll take it professionally. But please identify yourself.

Farah Haida said...

Geesshh... correction: to further develop*

You know what, no need to identify yourself. Owh, I'm not angry. Excuse me if I sound like I am. I'm open to debate and discussions. =D

Amethyste said...

I know wat u mean b...it just seems as tho they haven't really thought it through..need to look at the bigger picture, the overall effect..

To be honest...i think the foundation for a competitive economy is not there in our country. 'protectionism' in every sense is all around. And i agree...i think we all could use a push...too much protection and we become complacent and hence lazy...and that definitely does not provide a platform to move forward but just remain stagnant...

Farah Haida said...

waahhhhh. didn't expect that from a law student. wait a minute. what am i talking about. I SHOULD expect that from a law student... esp mimi. heh. i definitely agreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!! >Hugz<
i wanna buy cheap import cars... (suddenly soooooo not patriotic =p) But it's consumers' rights to choossseee. without protection we can choooseeee. eheh.

Farah Haida said...

owh mimi... quote "it just seems as tho they haven't really thought it through.." i think they probably have think it through but i think they are either economically un-savvy (is there such a word? eerrr, economically not so clever) or they are just moving backwards. Ok, now i think it's really obvious which side i'm on =p

Amethyste said...

u know what...that is so funny cause i had the car industry in mind when i wrote that hahahahha

n then tiba2 u said "i wanna buy cheap import cars" :P great minds think alike ;)

mr dx said...

my savvy is economical. 'nuff said.

oh, and, um, about protection... *grins cheekily*

Farah Haida said...

"grins cheekily"???
damn it!
now i'm thinking about another kind of protection. =p ssseesshhh
Azmir!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Amethyste said...

EXACTLY!!!
For a moment i thought it was just me :P seeeshhhh alright lol

Anonymous said...

the link is not my blog, dont have any.not to say summarize my ideology, but what is mentioned there is true. wallahu'alam

layen said...

Baby! Lama tak jenguk sekali ade banyak posts :D

Meh elections. I didn't register during summer so now I don't get the chance to vote haha. Eh I thought we are currently under subsidy for petrol? Or not? Or that means they are trying to increase the subsidy for petrol? If so, where are they going to get the money anyway?

Oh well, around this time la you get to here all the rubbish promises. And like someone said, this is the time to request things from your MP. Baru senang dapat haha.

mr dx said...

Boleh ke aku menjawab persoalan ko layen? hoho. secara amnya, ade desas-desus (sememangnya ini bukan perkataan yang cukup tepat) mengatakan bahawa subsidi petrol tidak lagi akan diberikan kepada rakyat kerana kerajaan tak mampu menanggung beban yang rasanya cukup tinggi itu..ya lah, nak ikutkan wang subsidi minyak sebanyak RM40 billion setahun itu boleh digunakan untuk pembangunan rakyat bukan?

ergh tatabahasa aku ni kire 8/10 jugak laa. self-review. keke.

azmimi & farah haida: i was talking about my savvy giving me the protection i need since the chassis is strong and durable and it should last longer, if you know what i mean. ho ho.

Farah Haida said...

mimi: hahahahhahahahha
azmir: like hah??? yeah, right
layen: We are currently being subsidize. About RM40bn or so. But with the rising crude oil prices, (reaching more than USD110 per barrel last week if i'm not mistaken), the government can't seem to subsidize it to maintain the RM1.92 per litre for petrol anymore. Again if I get it right, Pas is proposing to continue subsidizing and let the price of petrol stay at RM1.92. No doubt it is good for the people but in my opinion, it is not good for the economy. Your question makes perfect sense... How are they planning to cover that rising cost? If they plan to increase the tax, I'm going to smack them in the head.
anonymous: as i said, it is definitely not wrong (the article), but it has nothing to do at all with the topic in discussion. What could be related is topic on how Islamic countries need to be developed and successful in order to be recognized as a peaceful and respectable religion. How Muslim scholars need to seek knowledge to repeat the glorious times of Muslim discoveries.
Irna: Can you read the comments instead? I think the arguments are all there... It is still a long read but it's hard to summarize it in a few words.